An International Migrants workshop was held in Seoul

From August 28, to September 2, 1996, the Asian Migrant Center (AMC), Hong Kong, and the Joint Committee for Migrant Workers in Korea (JCMK), co-organised an international workshop with the theme, "Migrant workers Challenging Global Structures"

About 110 participants from 16 countries participated in the workshop. On the first day country reports were presented, where participants shared about their country's migrant workers situation and policies. On the second day, there was input and discussion on Globalisation, Economic Restructuring and labor Migration.

There was also a panel discussion in order to hear about the experiences and responses to migrant workers' problems from the point of view of a receiving country (JCMK), a sending country (Philippines), and from a regional level (Migrant Forum in Asia). This was followed by an open forum. The final day's program involved the preparation of the following statement.

The Conference Statement

We are 105 delegates coming from 16 countries in Asia, America and Europe, representing various migrant workers' organisations, migrant support groups, trade unions, women's groups, human rights organisations and religious bodies. We have come together on 28 August to 1 September 1966 in Seoul, Korea for the international migrants workshop, with the theme "Migrant Workers Challenging Global Structures".

We recognise that in Asia alone, there are an estimated 15 million migrant workers (documented and undocumented). Women migrant workers constitute an increasing percentage of these. Economic, political, socio-cultural and religious marginalisation characterise the plight of migrant workers.

Would domination and control by advanced capitalist interests through structural adjustment, liberalisation and deregulation programmes of the International Monetary Fund, World Bank, and World Trade Organization, abetted by the collusion of governments, have resulted in poverty, unemployment and underemployment, unequal distribution of wealth within and among nations, collapse of agriculture, and the absence of peace and security in countries within the region.

Advocates of globalisation argue that it hastens the transfer of skills and technology and enhances productivity and efficiency. The reality is, globalisation of economies reinforces the control of advanced capitalists interests on the less developed countries, leading to the continued marginalisation, if not disintegration, of economic and socio-cultural systems in many countries in the South.

Globalisation requires the removal of trade and investment barriers to facilitate the movement of capital, investments, goods and labor across national borders. At the same time, advanced capitalist countries like the U.S. and Japan adopt protectionist policies.

We are gravely concerned that globalisation is leading to profit-driven economies that thrive on cheap and docile labor, especially of women, and societies that stress consumerism and competition.

In turn, these have resulted in the erosion of human values, commodification of people (especially migrant workers), disintegration of societies, families and communities, racism, xenophobia, unsustainable lifestyles, and the degradation of the environment. Demand for cheap labor has led to subcontracting mechanisms, adoption of "trainee" schemes and increasing feminisation of migrant labor.

This translates into absence of accountability of companies especially transnational corporations (TNCs), unjust wage structures, absence of economic and social security, and violence against women and migrants. The migrant workers, uprooted from their families and communities, have to work under hostile, abusive and exploitative situations, and are generally denied their right to organise and unionise.

We recognise the fact that migrant workers, whether documented or undocumented, have rights as workers and as human beings as embodied in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UN Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, and other international conventions.

Initiatives have been taken by migrants and support groups in both sending and receiving countries in the areas of assistance to migrants, advocacy, lobbying, campaigning, networking, documentation/ information and research.

The challenge to migrant workers, support groups and the people is great. Globalisation gives rise to increasingly complex processes and situations. The relentless drive of the capitalists to pursue globalisation, and the governments' abdication of their responsibility to the people, make our tasks even greater. We boldly face this challenge.

Therefore:

  • We advocate cooperation among peoples and social systems which are empowering, people-oriented, and which promote sustainable life and holistic, integral human values.

  • We reject the existing model of development promoted by the IMF, WB, GATT/WTO and TNCs.

  • We reject APEC and similar free trade and investment mechanisms or agreements.

  • We hold governments accountable in providing decent employment for the people, and responsible for abetting the forces of globalisation.

We commit ourselves to:

  1. Intensify the migrants' campaign against globalisation and APEC.
  2. Strengthen and support the current lobbying and campaign initiatives for the ratification of the UN Convention for the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families.
  3. Continue and strengthen the migrant action alert mechanism to expose blatant violations of migrants' human rights (e.g. through the Migrant Forum in Asia).
  4. Undertake gender-sensitisation especially among migrants' advocates.
  5. Conduct a regional campaign on the issue of violence against women migrant workers.
  6. Declare a 'Migrant Workers' Day' every year for joint actions and education programmes across the region.
  7. Encourage trade unions in sending and receiving countries to build linkages on migrants' concerns.
  8. Develop disseminate and share education materials(manuals, etc) on globalisation and migrants' issues.
  9. Work towards a common documentation system (basic data, migrants' rights violations, migrants' directory, etc).
  10. Pressure governments to provide decent employment to the people, and encourage and monitor its efforts to undertake re-integration initiatives.
  11. Organise migrants' savings/investment groups and alternative livelihood.
  12. Integrate the recommendations of this conference in our respective organisational programmes.

Unanimously approved on 1 September
1996 in Seoul, Korea.
Posted by KWWA
|
We Oppose the Repeal of Menstruation Leave

In 1994, Korean managers had requested the repeal of paid menstruation leave for women in the labor law. At the time this bill did not pass because women workers' organizations and trade unions had strongly opposed it but after two years, the issue has again been raised by managers and government.

Managers and government who are working for it to be repealed are saying that, "There is no menstruation leave law anywhere else in the world. Therefore as we head for the 21st century, we must bring this law into line with the rest of the world". We oppose this view.

The Korean Women Workers Associations United (KWWAU), trade unions and women's organizations adopted a formal and collective resolution opposing the repeal of paid menstruation leave. In addition, these groups presented the position of women's groups regarding the repeal of paid menstruation leave to the National Assembly.

Labor trade unions and women's organizations are also gathering complaints of cases in which the leave was requested but refused. In these ways, women's labor movement groups plan to continue their collective struggle to oppose the repeal of paid menstruation leave.

  1. The repeal of paid menstruation leave will bring about the deterioration of working conditions

    Over 50% of women experiences physical symptoms during menstruation, including vomiting, dizziness, diarrhea, nausea, abdominal pains, waist and hip pains, general discomfort, psychological fatigue and depression and mental strain. Among these women, 25% feel pain severe enough to obstruct every day activity, and 40.4% of women workers note abnormal changes in their menstruation after quitting their jobs.

    Despite the fact that so many women workers experience such menstrual pain at work, menstruation leave is not currently being used freely. Women cite extra burdens to co-workers during leave, the dissatisfaction of managers, and the opportunity to supplement their low wages with the leave benefit as reasons for the low usage rate.

    In a situation in which low wages and high labor intensity make usage of menstruation leave difficult, it can be expected that even less, if any, women will opt to use the leave if it is changed to unpaid leave granted only at the request of the workers.

    In addition, when we consider that the leave is now being used by many women workers as a means of supplementing a wage level that only amounts to 55.7% of male wages, making menstruation leave unpaid would amount to a cut in women workers' wages.

    Finally, women workers now withstand harsh working conditions, including long hours some times exceeding 44 hours a week, work that requires standing, and alternative day and night work. As even monthly and annual leaves are not being used freely, repealing menstruation leave would signify great losses for maternity protection.

  2. Repeal of paid menstruation leave represents an effort to ignore the social responsibilities for maternity.

    The level of maternity benefits in Korea remains extremely low compared with international standards. Repealing menstruation leave without considering improvements in working conditions, shortened working hours, and expansion of leave benefits will only worsen working conditions and result in further deterioration of maternity protection.

    Although the government has promised to institute a fetal examination leave system in exchange for repealing menstruation leave, no concrete measures or executive orders have been presented.

    In a situation where the Equal Employment Law is only being nominally applied and where the existing maternity protection system has not been solidified, it is impossible to accept further retractions of protection through the repeal of this leave. In addition, the Ministry of Labor claims that companies avoid hiring women because of the burden of financing menstruation and maternity leaves.

    Yet, the Ministry fails to consider that rather than maternity protection itself, it is the government's labor policies, which place the entire financial burden on companies, that is the cause of such company actions. In the end, it is clear that the Ministry's proposal to make menstruation leave unpaid is aligned with the intent of business to worsen working conditions by repealing the monthly leave and instituting a system of flexible working hours, all under the name of strengthening international competitiveness.

    The idea that women's employment will be expanded by repealing menstruation leave represents only the intent of government to avoid its social responsibilities for maternity protection.

  3. Paid menstruation leave must not be repealed.

    The responsibility for reproducing and rearing the young leaders of the next generation lies not on the women as an individual, but on society as a whole.

    For this reason, maternity protection must take all maternal functions, including their formation, realization, and decline, as targets for benefits. Because a women's menstruation is directly related to maternal functions like pregnancy and childbirth, menstruation leave must without doubt be continued as a form of maternity protection.

    Rather than repealing the very minimal measures of maternity protection for purposes of international competitiveness, government and business must focus more attention on raising the working conditions of both male and female workers to international standards.

    Only when both male and female workers can be assured secure employment can international competitiveness be secured. Hence, we absolutely can and will not accept repeal of menstruation leave before we see improvements in working conditions, shortened hours, the elimination of low wages, guaranteed paid sick leave, and full employment equality for women.

Posted by KWWA
|

Korean Women Workers' Movement, Let's Fly High!
- in celebration of 100 years of international women's day, organized by Working Women's Hope Forum


사용자 삽입 이미지
Bustlingly and tumultuously! Working Women's Hope Forum started like that. Only one direction that the Korean women workers' movement was pursuing is not the only one solution. A new age has come, where we should "accept differences" and people have to be sensitive to the differences." However, we should also speak with one voice on important issues. In this sense, the Korean women workers' movement is not exceptional.

On March 4th 2008, about 70 women workers' activists gather together. In celebration of 100 years of international women's day, 6 member organizations (Korean Women Workers Association (KWWA), Korean Women's Trade Union (KWTU), Korean Womenlink, Korean Women’s Associations United (KWAU), Federation of Korean Trade Unions (FKTU), and Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) belonging to women workers' solidarity conference prepared for the working women's hope forum, entitled "Korean Women Workers' Movement, Let's Wing Away." In the first session, presentations were made. Each organization leader briefed its tasks and directions of activities for this year, and Dr. Eun Soo-mi and sociologist Lee Joo-hee, as experts gave suggestions about the situations and directions of the Korean women workers' movement. In the second session, participants were divided and carried out discussion by topic.

Kwon Mi-hyeok, chairperson of the Korean Womenlink started her brief presentation, suggesting "we should make approaches to women workers' daily lives, specific livelihoods and their work" as the foremost tasks. She also mentioned her organization's activity plans to reflect women workers' situation in law campaigns, and honestly told us of her diverse ways to make close approaches to discriminations women workers go through in their lives and workplace, saying "the Korean Womenlink will endeavor to fulfill our antidiscrimination related activities."

Next, Park Namhee, chairperson of KWTU indicated as its outward tasks, tackling discrimination against women workers and achieving effective equal pay for work of equal value, and removing discrimination against irregular workers, clearly stating "discrimination in the labor market is at a very dangerous level. In addition, she stated her organization's plans to reinforce leadership training for women staff and to practice activities for sharing pain together.

Kim Sunhee, director of FKTU's women bureau was followed, saying "there are still many difficulties in carrying out activities for women workers at FKTU", and mentioning her activity plans to cultivate women executive members, to fulfill affirmative actions, and to monitor to what extent women workers' issues can be reflected in the collective agreements.

Kim Jung-A, head of women's department of KCTU stated "KCTU's foremost issue is to form industry union nowadays. I have raised my concerns for how to tackle gender issues in the new era of industry based trade unions." She also presented us her plans to carry out research projects to tackle discrimination in terms of wages and employment and to protect women workers' occupational safety and health, and activities to balance work and family, plans to enhance gender equality through affirmative actions in the organization and provide leadership training for women staff, and those to carry out compulsory training on gender equality through regulation amendment.

Choi Sangrim, chairperson of KWWA stated "KWWA has already evaluated its achievements for the last 20 years and set up future directions." She also underlined her future plans to improve appropriate organizational activities for women workers, to call for legal changes to jump over polarized labor markets, and to provide alternative social activities to confront prevailing social norms. In particular, she claimed that the women workers' movement should be expanded in their lives as well as in the workplace to fight against neo-liberalization, and mentioned her concerns for fostering alternative discourses and philosophies on quality of life as well as addressing wages and discrimination issues in the women workers' movement.

Dr. Eun Soo-mi as an expert penal gave her message saying "I really hope the Korean women workers' movement can achieve its wings of hope." She also underlined "we should address something similar in similar ways and use different methods to address something different," mentioning that the women workers' movement should look at how to treat differences amongst women. She also pointed out the needs for sensitivity for social minorities and active collective activities.

Lee Joo-hee, a professor in the Sociology Dept., as an expert penal addressed how to remove task segregation by gender, to reduce wage gaps by gender and by type of employment, to prevent in direct employment of irregular workers (prevent women workers from being subcontracted), to activate female union membership, and to improve occupational safety and health for women workers.

In the second session, participants were divided into two groups: one exchanged views about 'equal pay for work of equal value' and the other, 'daily lives and concerns of women workers' activists'. At last participants declaimed a statement entitled 'women workers, declare a new age of hope.'

Posted by KWWA
|

 “Single Parent Families Fly High with the Wing of Hope”

On November 24, 2007 about 100 women single parents and people involved in our project joined a heartwarming briefing on the single parent family care service support project. Reports of processes and activities undertaken for 9 months were made. 78 out of 164 were found to be employed and receive vocational training. We were all pleased at our care receivers' high satisfaction levels, as 99 answered they were psychologically stable since good care of their children were taken and 127 were satisfied because women single parents are become less pressed for time.

 

Followed were presentations about how 28 year-old woman single parent and another who became a single parent when studying abroad and are now living with her two children had been looked after and changed, by our activists in charge of the project in Ansan and Seoul. Additionally, Soon-Im Lee, a care mother dispatched to houses, belonging to the Suwon Women’s Association briefed about her sentiments and advantages of the project felt during the period of her looking after children, and also expressed her gratitude for giving her a chance to participate in the good project. We were all very touched.

 

Then, when told was serious suffering about Cho Ee-Han  who have been receiving care from Buchon Women Workers Association, whose husband died of stomach cancer and whose daughter are suffering from the Moyamoya disease, and who had to find another wing of hope since this service project would be stopped in February 2008, participants dropped their tears.

 

The heartrending story encouraged us to make and present single parents’ 5 wishes, as fundamental solutions (1. Realize social incorporation through supporting single parent families 2. Increase job opportunities through providing practical and substantial vocational training for single parents 3. Prevent poverty through assisting and increasing self-independence of single parents 4. Ensure the right to health through giving medical assistance to single parents 5. Increase standards of living and life satisfaction through improving residential environments). For entertainment songs and dances were presented, well-prepared by our regional organizations. The briefing and its subsequent events were fun, providing touches of humanities and inspiring all of us.

Posted by KWWA
|

 

‘Rice represents public sentiments’: the performance of a dish made with all five grains was given

 

On both November 14th and 15th 2007, the Korean Women’s Associations United (KWWA) organized to presidential candidates, 60 policy tasks presenting ceremonies, under the title of ‘Rice represents public sentiments.’

 

Almost throughout this year, KWWA had discussed and formulated agendas with its 6 branch organizations and 29 member organizations. Under the slogan ‘Let’s work together and take care together,’ selected are as 4 key tasks, tCreating good jobs through expanding public-spirited social services tincreasing supports for encouraging single parent families’ independence texpanding child care and support after school, and tinstituting gender-sensitive education on peace and human rights.

 

KWWA presented the selected 60 policy tasks to each presidential candidate through the performance of a dish made with all five grains (rice, millet, beans, wheat, and barnyard millet) entitled ‘Rice represents public sentiments.’ The first policy tasks presenting ceremony were prepared for Moon Kuk-hyun, Creative Korea Party’s presidential candidate on November 14th 2007, and Jung Dong-young, United Democratic Party’s candidate and Kwon Young Gil, Democratic Labor Party’s candidate on November 15th 2007, respectively.

 

Rice symbolizing public sentiment and a dish made with all five grains symbolizing longevity, health, prosperity of offspring, and abundant livelihood stand for good jobs and various social support systems. At the same time when KWWA conveyed the 60 policy tasks along with the dish made with all five grains, the candidates promised to KWWA that good care of the livelihood of the people, women, and economy for the masses should be taken like warm rice in the era of socioeconomic polarization.

 

On November 14th 2007, at the ceremony KWWA’s policy tasks were given to Moon Kuk-hyun, Creative Korea Party’s presidential candidate. He stressed “About 60 trillion Won are created as black money and slush funds from the industry of civil engineering and construction. Out of the back money, if only 20 trillion Won are used for child care and welfare for children Korea can be a World’ top welfare country as livable as European countries.” Additionally, a Creative Korea Party’s policy kit for women ‘Women are hope’ was given to KWWA at the ceremony.

 

On November 15th 2007, many congresswomen working in the election preparation committee for the gender equality attended the ceremony organized for Jung Dong-young, United Democratic Party’s candidate. Namhee Park, chairperson of the Korean Women's Trade Union (KWTU) underlined the importance of good jobs for women, mentioning “70% of Korean working women are irregular workers,” when giving the agendas to the candidate. Jang Myung-sook, a chairperson of the Differently Abled Women United claimed “The average academic attainment of disabled women is elementary school graduation. Policies for poor women should vary by life circle.” Jung Dong-young gave his opinion on women’s policies saying “The amount of 9 trillion Won from the budget is needed if the government takes social responsibility for pregnancy, child delivery, and childcare. My fundamental principal is to back up investment on people. The essence of the investment on people is that the state should take care of pregnancy, child delivery, and childcare.”

 

Additionally, on November 15th 2007, at the ceremony KWWA’s policy tasks were presented to Kwon  Young Gil , Democratic Labor Party’s candidate. Meehyuk Kwon, a co-chairperson of the Korean Womenlink emphasized “I hope the agendas for women will not be given in to other tasks. I hope the agendas for women can be realized.”

 

Participants in the ceremonies had a heart-stirring time on the two days in a row, awakening the importance of policies for women to the presidential candidates. The candidates also showed their wills to reflect and implement the policy tasks developed by KWWA.

 

However, although KWWA asked for his arrangement several times, Lee Myoung Bak, Grand National Party’s presidential candidate did not set up a schedule for KWWA’s policy tasks-presenting ceremony.

 

Written by Han-Whang  Joo Yeon , KWWA

Posted by KWWA
|

 

On November 14, 2007, 101 nationwide human rights, women and religious NGOs including Korean Women Workers Association (KWWA) and Korean Women’s Associations United (KWAU) met the press in front of the Chung Wa Dae (the Presidential Residence), in order to call for the appropriate enactment of a Discrimination Prevention Act.

 

A press conference was called to denounce the reduction in the scopes of discrimination stipulated by the bill although it was already discussed at a public hearing, and to enact an appropriate act during the tenure of this president.

 

Initially, it was stipulated in the Discrimination Prevention Act that ‘treatments and actions of segregating, differentiating, restricting, excluding or disadvantaging an individual or a group in excuse of marriage, pregnancy or childbirth, type of family, religion, ideology or political view, criminal records, custody, sexual orientation, educational background, social status, and physical conditions including sex, disability, age, nationality, ethnicity, race, skin color, native place, appearance without any reasonable reason’ are classified into scopes of discrimination, and the Law Ministry made its preliminary announcement from October 2nd 2007. Nevertheless, the articles regarding ‘sexual orientation, educational background and military record, nationality, language, criminal records, type of family and family condition’ were removed, when the bill was submitted to the Regulatory Reform Committee after the period of the public preliminary notification.

 

At the press conference, a statement was made by Nam-Yoon Insoon. Followed were denouncements by Park-Kim Younghee (activist of Solidarity against Disability Discrimination),  Kim  Jungbum (a chairperson of Association of Physicians for Humanism and Korean Federation of Medical Groups of Health Rights), Cho Heejoo (from Progressive Education Network), clergywoman Lee  Moonsook (secretary general of Korea Church Women United), Jang  Seo-yon (lawyer from Gong-Gam, a public interest lawyers’ group) who denounced the problematic reduction in the scopes of discrimination. After that, performances were carried out to call for the enactment of an appropriate discrimination prevention act as a means of realizing an ‘equal society,’ and a press release was read. Participating organizations discussed future actions and planned to take a variety of actions to enact the appropriate discrimination prevention bill.

 

Written by Park-Cha Okkyung, KWAU

 

 


Press Release

 

Noh Mu Hyun’s administration, enact an appropriate Discrimination Prevention Act during his tenure!


November 14th 2007

  

The enactment of ‘Discrimination Prevention Act’ suggested by the Law Ministry was under construction with the shrunken scopes of discrimination when the preliminary notification of the enactment was made after a public hearing was held on September 12, 2007.

 

It is stipulated in the proposed act that ‘treatments and actions of segregating, differentiating, restricting, excluding or disadvantaging an individual or a group in excuse of marriage, pregnancy or childbirth, type of family, religion, ideology or political view, criminal record, custody, sexual orientation, educational background, social status, and physical conditions including sex, disability, age, nationality, ethnicity, race, skin color, native place, appearance without any reasonable reason’ are classified into scopes of discrimination. Nevertheless, the articles regarding ‘sexual orientation, educational background and military record, nationality, language, criminal records, type of family and family condition’ were removed, when the bill was submitted to the Regulatory Reform Committee after the period of public preliminary notification.

 

Social agreement on ‘discrimination’ shouldn’t be receded anymore

 

The aims of the act are shown in the initial ‘Discrimination Prevention Act’ to ‘stop and to prevent discrimination in all areas including political, economic and cultural lives, and to effectively redeem and relieve damages due to the discrimination as a means of realizing human dignity and equality.’ As cases regarding the 7 scopes of discrimination removed by the Law Ministry frequently take place in our daily life, the bill should include the scopes. Public opinions and the authorities concerned were already collected and reflected to the initially proposed act about four and half years until July 2006 from January 2003 when the National Human Rights Commission of Korea had organized the Discrimination Prevention Enactment Promotion Committee, and gained social agreement on the scopes of discrimination. Nevertheless, the Law Ministry arbitrarily shrank the scopes to reflect opinions from some conservative groups and religious organizations which are in opposition to the enactment. This shows the low awareness of Noh Mu Hyun’s administration on ‘discrimination.’

 

The government shouldn’t defame the Discrimination Prevention Act anymore

 

The act after the preliminary announcement was substantially shrunk back compared to that suggested by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea. In Law Minister's act making process ‘type of employment’ was removed from discrimination prevention reasons because the government had been concerned about persistent oppositions raised by business circles, and the tattered act was preliminarily announced with the arbitrary shrunk scope of discrimination, while some measures regarding orders to remedy, fines for compulsory fulfillment, disciplinary compensations for damages for ill intentioned discriminations, and feasible discrimination redemptions such as transfers of burden of proofs were removed. To make it worse, it is declared that the Law Ministry got rid of characteristic reasons for discrimination including ‘sexual orientation, educational background and military record, nationality, language, criminal record, type of family and situations of family’ as a means of considering the oppositions of some religious groups and conservative organizations. 


The Law Ministry emphasized its rebirth as Human Rights & Law Ministry, installing the bureau of human rights. But, the steps against the principle taken by the ministry in the process of the enactment, show the ministry is a timid one with an air of surprise rather than Human Rights & Law Ministry. The ministry should try to revive the 7 removed articles regarding the scopes of discrimination, substantially consolidate measures regarding discrimination redemptions, and present an effective bill in the National Assembly. The ministry should be responsible for blocking an appropriate enactment, if a suitable bill is not submitted for any reason.

 

President Noh should undertake the appropriate enactment

 

President Noh Mu Hyun underlined the ‘development of a well-balanced society’ as his vision and aim that all of us must continue to pursue for five years when he took office. Without the structure of conflicts such as privileges, discrimination and exclusion, a well-balanced advanced society can be realized in which people are united. Though late, nevertheless it is fortunate that the government has carried out the enactment of the bill. However, we are concerned about to what extent the tattered Discrimination Prevention Act can prevent, stop, and redeem various types of discriminations, and if the bill can enhance its sensitiveness and awareness of discrimination as a fundamental law. Noh Mu Hyun's administration should apply its initial critical mind to the appropriate enactment. The government should suggest in the National Assembly, an act which can substantially include the recommendations made by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea, not the current one preliminarily announced by the Law Ministry.

 

We are opposed to the wrong process in which Noh Mu Hyun's administration has anxiously focused on only the legislation even though the Discrimination Prevention Act is tattered. The government should do all its best to revive the removed reasons for discrimination prevention and to generate an effective and feasible Discrimination Prevention Act.

 

Announced by 101 nationwide human rights, women and religious NGOs including Korean Women Workers Association (KWWA) and Korean Women’s Associations United (KWAU) in order to call for the enactment of an appropriate Discrimination Prevention Act

Posted by KWWA
|


National Women’s Rally was held on November 11, 2007.

 

Unfortunately many women from other regions were not able to join the rally due to severe traffic jams, and so at the begining of the rally women living in Seoul and Gyonggi province mainly took part. But happily women from other regions such as Jinjoo and Cheongjoo finally managed to join together.

 

Women had a meaningful and valuable time with other citizens to prevent FTA from being ratified with the US and to remove discrimination against irregular workers.

Posted by KWWA
|

- a series of Kwon Younggil, Democratic Labor Party’s presidential candidate

 


On November 8th 2007, Korean Women Workers Association (KWWA) and Korean Women’s Trade Union (KWTU) jointly organized presidential election pledges-delivering symposiums. Under the presidency of Choi Sangrim, chairperson of KWWA, a symposium as the second sequence was held to make women workers’ demands to Kwon Younggil, Democratic Labor Party’s presidential candidate.

 

Initially, the candidate was supposed to attend the symposium, but instead, Noh Hoe-chan, the election polling committee president, Ae-ja Hyun, a national assembly member belonging to the Health and Welfare Committee, Lee Soo-jung, Seoul Metropolitan Council member, and Park  Insook, supreme council member joined the symposium, because the schedule of the candidate overlapped with a TV program, 100 minute Debate. It is said that the candidate hopes to become a gender sensitive president in the era of women activation.

 

The Democratic Labor Party presents improving women’s economic and social powers, ensuring women’s rights to security and health, and enhancing gender equal policies as presidential election pledges in the women related areas.

 

In details, the Democratic Labor Party presents as essential presidential election pledges by session, insuring women’s rights to work, removing women’s poverty and expanding social securities, guaranteeing women’s rights to pregnancy, baby delivery and health, realizing female safe society, guaranteeing social statuses of various forms of families, politicizing women at grassroots levels, and gender equality.

 

Women workers at the workplace asked the following questions, after the Democratic Labor Party gave a brief presentation about its election pledges:

 

ŸQ (by Huh Jang-hui, dismissed Lotte Hotel worker): I am undergoing unreasonable minimum wages and insecure employment as a subcontracted worker. Has the Democratic Labor Party prepared for any countermeasure to tackle unreasonable minimum wages and insecure employment and increasing irregular jobs in the public sector?

 A: It is desirable that subcontracted workers should be upgraded to directly-employed workers. Mother companies and contractors should be included to the scope of employers. Minimum wages should be increased to 50% of average wages of regular workers, and up to 60% in the long term.

 

ŸQ (by Kim Eun-sook, assistant of 88CC): Do you have specially-hired workers related policies?

 A: Rights to work for specially-hired workers should be guaranteed and labor’s three major rights should be protected.

 

ŸQ (by Park Namhee, chairperson of KWTU): Please tell me how to realize the equal pay for work of equal value in practice in the public sector in order to tackle the expansion of irregular jobs and gender discrimination?

 A: legal realization of the equal pay for work of equal value is needed. Job evaluation-based wage systems should be implemented in gender-sensitive perspectives.

 

ŸQ (Um Kyeong-ae, Incheon Women Workers Association): Please tell me how to implement social insurances including reducing social insurance fees and introducing childbirth credits.

 A: Many people including farmers, small-size self-employed people, and irregular workers are excluded from the social insecurity system. Achieving their legal statuses as workers is a key point. For example, house caretakers cannot sign secure employment contracts with employers, and the number of job placement agencies is about 7,000 across the nation and among them that of public job centers is 500. However, just 7~80 job centers play a substantial role. The public job center-led reorganization in the house caretaker market should be made. The enactment of gender discrimination prevention laws will increase the current health insurance coverage level to 90% from 60%.

 

ŸQ (by Hong Seonghee, manager of National Cooperative of House Managers in Ansan): House caretakers’ rights are largely violated. They are not covered by social insurances, working in tough working conditions. They have also experienced severe and forced job allocations. Please tell me how to decrease harmful paid job placement agencies?

 

ŸQ (Kim Ok-hee, member of single parents’ meeting belonging to Ansan Women Workers Association): Do you have any measure to support living costs, medical fees and university tuition fees when single parents receive job training in order to find skilled jobs?

 A: We will set up social systems for supporting marginalized single parent families.

 

ŸQ: Even public jobs created by the government always provide payment in accordance with minimum wages. I wonder why the government establishes the minimum wage system?

 A: “Important is what sort of a regime.” I believe it depends on perspectives and philosophy rather than money. In relation to the expansion of social services, it is only Democratic Labor Party that raises issues regarding the employment of social service workers.

 

ŸQ: Please tell me about discrimination against irregular workers at schools.

 A: Even we wonder if relevant polices are feasible even though they were discussed. That’s why, we have prepared reliable budgeting since the presidential election in 2002. (Equal pays for) irregular workers in the public sector are viewed as possibly insured from the budget. However assistance for irregular workers in the private sector should be made, and especially for those who are working at very small size companies with less than 100 workers. The regularization of irregular workers in the public sector is feasible from the current national budget.

 

ŸQ: Please tell me about your plan to remove gaps in education.

 A: I think (policy-making in) education is up to perspectives: some view it as a product, others as a public service and welfare. Korean public share in the field of education is 30%. In Korea only at the age of 19, lifestyles are restricted, partners are decided, and sizes of their houses and friends are limited. The present 5% should be increased to 7%, in terms of budget on education. Private universities and colleges account for 80%, and in the circumstances I believe standardizing them is difficult in Korea. The Seoul National University should be reorganized on the basis of postgraduate schools, and other national or public universities should be upgraded to the level in which the Seoul National University maintains. Close networks amongst national or public universities will be able to remove barriers between schools. The advancement in education is standardizing. The number of national or public universities should be increased and (levels from elementary schools to universities and colleges) should be standardized.

 

ŸQ: Please tell me about your measurements in housing.
 
A: As prices of real estates rise, there has been an increase in the cost of production. If an increase is made by 10 billion won, some people should burden that. Profits gained by investments in real estates should be socially collected.

 

At the end, the tree of hope conveying the voices of women workers was given as presidential agendas, to the Democratic Labor Party. Women workers’ voices must be heard as Democratic Labor Party’s good policies in practice.

 

Note taken and summarized by Shin MyungJin

Posted by KWWA
|




 

I was looking forward to seeing the Women Workers Film Festival and its curtain was finally raised. It has become far better and developed over time since 2004 when the first festival was commenced. On Saturday, November 3rd, 2007, although the festival was just commenced, it was so popular that all the seats were highly occupied. The Women Workers Film Festival will last for other 3 days with the help of hardworking volunteers including middle school students to members of the society, regardless of occupation and age.

 

The opening ceremony was the most eye-catching. At the opening addresses, Choi Sangrim, Chairperson of Korean Women Workers Association, Park  Namhee, Chairperson of Korean Women's Trade Union, and Yoon Hye-ryeon, Chairperson of Seoul Women Workers Association addressed a message that the films are about ordinary women, our mothers, our sisters and themselves in Korea, and asked for our constant interests in the festival. In addition, they evaluated the 1970s to be the history of struggles, and little improvement has been made in terms of working conditions and demands of workers who the films portray, mentioning this festival offers a venue to confirm that. However, they underlined they would have continued to carry out their struggles to improve working conditions, and hoped many people can join the movement together.

 

Kang Kyeonghee, chairperson of the Korea Foundation for Women, Park Soo-ae, wife of Creative Korea Party’s president, Lee Kyeong-eun, chairperson of Eui-jeongbu Women Association joined the film as guests. Followed are greetings by volunteers who help to bloom and fruit the festival, conveying their affections and hopes for the successful festival.

 

A performance by ‘rapping peppermint’ was followed. The performance created a festive mood and encouraged people to take an active part. From time to time, the musicians added rap lyrics for their congratulations on this festival. It was very amusing and fun.

 

In an interview, Bae Jin-kyung, secretary-general of KWWA in charge of planning and organizing this festival hoped we could have a good time to raise our concerns for the society, awaken our self-images and look at what have happened and what is truth in the society, rather than just accept distorted social images delivered by the press. The Phantom of the Operator was designated as an opening film. This Canadian film is a black-and-white film, whose beauty is its special structure. When the organizer let us know her funny episode experienced when she tried to import the film, a cheerful atmosphere was created. A good start guarantees a good end! I hope the Women Workers Film Festival with a good start can give a big leap forward in the end. I hope audiences and participants can have a valuable opportunity to improve their awareness to the higher level: ‘my stories, and important issues in our society’ not ‘her stories’ or ‘others stories different from me’,

written by Sookyoung, a volunteer

Posted by KWWA
|



There has been increasing criticism for the unjust decision on the reinstatement of wrongdoers responsible for sexual harassment. On December 11, 2007, at a news conference, about 30 activists and members from Korean Confederation of Trade Unions, Federation of Korean Trade Unions, Korean Women's Trade Union, and Korean Women Workers Association, and Women Corea protested in front of the National Labor Relations Commission, against the unjust decision of the sexual harassment case occurring at Incheon International Airport.

 

The activists claimed “the decision on the sexual harassment occurring at Incheon International Airport accepted only the statement made by the wrongdoer and mostly ignored special circumstances regarding this sexual harassment case. We suspect the public committee members of the National Labor Relations Commission to be inappropriate and unqualified, so that they should not be involved in making decisions on sexual harassment cases. We demand the National Labor Relations Commission which made this decision on the reinstatement of the wrongdoer responsible for sexual harassment should deprive the public commission members in charge of their qualifications, should increase female commission members's ratios, and show a future plan for upgrading and conducting gender-sensitive perspectives in practice.”

Posted by KWWA
|