Debate forum with Dr. Christine Bergmann, former Minister of Women, Germany
HOT ISSUES & NOTICE 2009. 12. 31. 11:09On the past November 18, the KWWA invited Dr. Christine Bergmann, former Minister of Women of Germany and held a debate forum with her on the theme of Neo-liberalism and women’s policies, focusing on measures on women irregular workers between
Dr. Bergmann said “
After the unification with
Dispatched jobs, involuntary part-time jobs and mini jobs are classified into insecure jobs in
Dr. Bergmann told us that
l “The nation is responsible for childcare and the provision of education facilities.”
In the case of the former East Germany, high employment rates of men and women, both were due to social atmospheres, and further because of state’ supports for childcare, running work-site childcare centers across the nation.
Since women in West Germany were not seen as major householders, and moreover there is a great shortage of social supports for women’s economic activities and social recognition, it was very difficult for West German women to balance women’s jobs and family work, which was shown by an idiom, ‘the crow mom’. After the unification,
Why German women have to take low-paying part-time work including mini jobs is in the shortage of general childcare facilities. In
l Suggestions to construct the ‘paradise’ where women can work securely:
After Dr. Bergmann gave a speech about general conditions of women’s employment in the former East Germany and in Germany after the unification, she made suggestions to stabilize women’s jobs as follows: ▲ the social recognition of women’s jobs should be enhanced: values of traditional care work should be re-appreciated and proper wage lines should be set; ▲ involuntary part-time work should be decreased; ▲ childcare facilities should be increased; and ▲ additional social protection should be prepared in the sectors in which social insurances are not covered.
After the keynote presentation, Dr. Eun Soomi, a penal, working for the Korea Labor Institute made a presentation on the women’s labor market in Korea, as follows: ▲ Korean women experience their stoppage in their working careers at their ages of 30 ~ 34, and re-enter to the labor market offering poor jobs; ▲ gender occupational segregation; ▲ the increases in the number of poor jobs such as irregular jobs; ▲ women’s low employment rate of just around 50%; and ▲ increasing gaps in terms of wage, job welfare, and social insurances. These issues have been worsening for the past 10 years. Dr. Eun suggested the changes in the government’s policy stances for women, expansion of social security nets, reinforcement of public childcare and education systems, and pro-active activities of women’s circles.
Jo-Lee Yeo-ul of ilda, a womenist journal approached women’s economic difficulties from the perspectives of housing and education as well as labor issues. She pointed out “people tend to see labor and prostitution separately. Teenagers who run away from their homes are likely engaged to sex industries because they had difficulties in achieving economic independence and housing. She also criticized the current Korean state in which parents usually have to carry the burden of high private education expenses for their children due the overheated private education, regardless of their income levels.
The last penal, Dr. Hong Mihee (head of Women’s Policy Center belonging to Incheon Development Institute) pointed out no relationship between educational levels and women’s participation rate in economic activities in Korea, while the higher educational levels, the higher participation rate in economic activities in Germany. She concluded that Korean women with high educational levels evaded from the labor market after their marriage, and it is difficult for them to re-enter the labor market because of the shortage of the number of jobs available in social service sectors even though they want to.